Skip to content
DefDex

Federal award

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.

0033

Contract

Obligated and Ceiling

Obligated (net)
$3,837,512.42
Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
$4,640,812.00
Current value
$4,640,812.00
Gross positive obligations
$4,381,659.00

Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.

Award Details

Owner company
Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
Reported parent
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. · DTZJAQF8NZA1
Awarding agency
Department of Defense · sub-agency 97JC · office HQ0147
Funding agency
Department of Defense · sub-agency 97JC
Product or service (PSC)
AC21 · NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH
Industry (NAICS)
541710 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES
PIID
0033
Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
FA863205D2455
Award type code
C
Actions
19 · Oct 5, 2007 to Jan 31, 2013
Why it is listed
gross positive obligations of $250k or more (contracts)

Open this award on USAspending →

Action History19

Award actions
DateFYModAction typeObligationCompany in company totals
Jan 31, 2013FY201318C−$3,838.58
—
Oct 29, 2012FY201317C−$46,972.00
—
Feb 15, 2012FY201216M−$2,945.00
—
Sep 26, 2011FY201115M$0.00
—
Jul 15, 2011FY201114C−$490,391.00
—
Nov 15, 2010FY201113C$472,679.00
—
Oct 13, 2010FY201112M$0.00
—
Sep 9, 2010FY201011C$750,000.00
—
Sep 18, 2009FY200910M$0.00
—
Sep 8, 2009FY20099B$672,996.00
—
Jul 6, 2009FY20098M$0.00
—
Jan 23, 2009FY20097B$382,978.00
—
Sep 25, 2008FY20086B$378,623.00
—
Jun 6, 2008FY20085M$0.00
—
May 29, 2008FY20084M$0.00
—
May 8, 2008FY20083C$524,383.00
—
May 1, 2008FY20082B$81,740.00
—
Jan 17, 2008FY20081M$0.00
—
Oct 5, 2007FY20080—$1,118,260.00
—

Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.