Federal award
MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES
BA01
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $7,342,499.53
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $10,567,558.81
- Current value
- $7,342,499.53
- Gross positive obligations
- $10,397,929.20
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES · LN9PU5M2YZN5
- Owner company
- Not a reviewed companyNo reviewed company owns this recipient.
- Reported parent
- MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES · LN9PU5M2YZN5
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100 · office W560MY
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 2100
- Product or service (PSC)
- R706 · SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: LOGISTICS SUPPORT
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541611 · ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
- PIID
- BA01
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- W91GY007D0017
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 12 · Sep 26, 2009 to Sep 30, 2014
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $250k or more (contracts)
Action History12
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2014 | FY2014 | 12 | D | −$3,055,429.67 | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | FY2012 | 10 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 7 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | FY2011 | 6 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | FY2011 | 5 | B | $3,145,493.00 | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FY2010 | 4 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | FY2010 | 3 | C | $3,133,328.00 | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | FY2010 | 2 | M | $0.00 | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FY2010 | 1 | B | $0.00 | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | FY2009 | 0 | — | $4,119,108.20 | — |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.