Federal award
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
VC09
Contract
Obligated and Ceiling
- Obligated (net)
- $13,214,121.53
- Ceiling (potential value, not spending)
- $13,214,121.53
- Current value
- $13,214,121.53
- Gross positive obligations
- $13,429,923.76
Obligated is what the government has committed, net of de-obligations. The ceiling is the most the award or vehicle could ever reach; it is shown separately and never added to, or compared as, spending.
Award Details
- Recipient
- SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION · MMLKPW9JLX64
- Owner company
- SAICBasis direct: the recipient is the company's own reviewed UEI.
- Reported parent
- SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION · RE7WMNV9L719
- Awarding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 97AK · office HC1084
- Funding agency
- Department of Defense · sub-agency 97AK
- Product or service (PSC)
- R421 · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
- Industry (NAICS)
- 541712 · RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)
- PIID
- VC09
- Parent vehicle (IDV PIID)
- HC102808D2025
- Award type code
- C
- Actions
- 25 · Jul 29, 2010 to Dec 20, 2023
- Why it is listed
- gross positive obligations of $250k or more (contracts); reviewed company, $10k or more
Action History25
| Date | FY | Mod | Action type | Obligation | Company in company totals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | FY2024 | 24 | K | −$215,802.23 | |
| Dec 13, 2012 | FY2013 | 23 | C | $750,000.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Aug 22, 2012 | FY2012 | 22 | C | $545,000.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jul 11, 2012 | FY2012 | 21 | C | $1,470,588.24 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| May 31, 2012 | FY2012 | 20 | C | $113,441.89 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Apr 12, 2012 | FY2012 | 19 | C | $36,000.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Apr 11, 2012 | FY2012 | 18 | C | $1,764,000.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jan 30, 2012 | FY2012 | 17 | B | $1,325,000.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jan 24, 2012 | FY2012 | 16 | C | $250,328.61 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jan 12, 2012 | FY2012 | 15 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Sep 16, 2011 | FY2011 | 14 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FY2011 | 13 | C | $495,508.23 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Aug 19, 2011 | FY2011 | 12 | C | $424,044.24 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Aug 15, 2011 | FY2011 | 11 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Aug 1, 2011 | FY2011 | 10 | C | $1,413,604.03 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jul 29, 2011 | FY2011 | 9 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jul 13, 2011 | FY2011 | 8 | A | $150,216.44 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Apr 8, 2011 | FY2011 | 7 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Feb 18, 2011 | FY2011 | 6 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Feb 17, 2011 | FY2011 | 5 | C | $1,137,771.58 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jan 24, 2011 | FY2011 | 4 | M | $0.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Dec 21, 2010 | FY2011 | 3 | C | $332,390.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Nov 19, 2010 | FY2011 | 2 | C | $453,509.80 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FY2010 | 1 | B | $489,382.00 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
| Jul 29, 2010 | FY2010 | 0 | — | $2,279,138.70 | Leidos Counted for Leidos in company totals (direct) |
Newest first. Every obligation is shown as reported, including zero and negative (de-obligation) actions. Award lists belong to the company of the latest action; company totals credit each action to the company named on that row, so a note marks rows where the two differ.