Skip to content
DefDex
Teledyne Technologies logo

Supplier · United States

Teledyne Technologies

HQ Thousand OaksTDY

Teledyne Technologies makes sensing, imaging, instrumentation and electronics products, reported in four segments: Digital Imaging, Instrumentation, Aerospace and Defense Electronics, and Engineered Systems. Its businesses include Teledyne FLIR. U.S. Government sales were $1.56 billion in 2025, 25.5% of net sales, and the Department of War was its main government customer.

Supplier
Website
Prime obligations
$5.06B
Since FY2008 · incl. subsidiaries
Prime awards
7,559
Every award since FY2008

Federal Prime Contracts$5.06B obligated · FY2008–FY2027

Explore in Awards →
Obligated
$5.06B
FY2008–FY2027
Contract actions
18,242
7,559 awards
Peak year
FY2024
$375M
Top buyer
NASA
26% of obligations
Obligations by fiscal yearLast 5 full years avg $304MFaded: FY2026 so far; DoD publishes actions about 90 days late.
FY2008: $284M · 1,281 actionsFY2009: $291M · 1,339 actionsFY2010: $281M · 1,384 actionsFY2011: $293M · 1,352 actionsFY2012: $240M · 1,147 actionsFY2013: $183M · 987 actionsFY2014: $203M · 1,018 actionsFY2015: $188M · 980 actionsFY2016: $268M · 1,060 actionsFY2017: $236M · 989 actionsFY2018: $197M · 920 actionsFY2019: $304M · 989 actionsFY2020: $259M · 745 actionsFY2021: $306M · 791 actionsFY2022: $286M · 907 actionsFY2023: $269M · 713 actionsFY2024: $375M · 715 actionsFY2025: $281M · 534 actionsFY2026 (to date): $313M · 390 actions
’08’12’16’20’24’26
Show as table
Obligations by fiscal year
Fiscal yearObligatedActionsAwards
FY2026 (to date)$313M390206
FY2025$281M534292
FY2024$375M715458
FY2023$269M713469
FY2022$286M907574
FY2021$306M791524
FY2020$259M745461
FY2019$304M989583
FY2018$197M920546
FY2017$236M989631
FY2016$268M1,060685
FY2015$188M980635
FY2014$203M1,018640
FY2013$183M987608
FY2012$240M1,147640
FY2011$293M1,352723
FY2010$281M1,384706
FY2009$291M1,339697
FY2008$284M1,281645

Top buyers

  1. NASA$1.34B 26%
  2. U.S. Navy$1.10B 22%
  3. U.S. Army$798M 16%
  4. U.S. Air Force$650M 13%
  5. Missile Defense Agency$427M 8.4%
  6. Defense Logistics Agency$210M 4.1%
  7. U.S. Special Operations Command$186M 3.7%
  8. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$152M 3.0%
  9. Federal Aviation Administration$41.5M 0.8%
  10. U.S. Geological Survey$33.5M 0.7%
  11. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$26.6M 0.5%
  12. US Coast Guard$24.5M 0.5%
  13. All other$75.9M 1.5%

Defense programs

  1. MDA SUPPORT$502M 9.9%
  2. STATUS OF FORCES AGREEMENT$28.6M 0.6%
  3. B-1B$14.1M 0.3%
  4. F-15$6.2M 0.1%
  5. EA-6B$5.6M 0.1%
  6. EA-18G Growler$5.3M 0.1%
  7. F-16$5.2M 0.1%
  8. BLACK HAWK (UH-60A/L)$4.2M 0.1%
  9. THAAD$1.8M 0.0%
  10. P-8A Poseidon$980K 0.0%
  11. F/A-18E/F Super Hornet$667K 0.0%
  12. MQ-4C Triton$498K 0.0%
  13. CHEM DEMIL-CMA$326K 0.0%
  14. MTRS INC II$255K 0.0%
  15. COBRA JUDY REPLACEMENT$253K 0.0%
  16. All other$389K 0.0%

Only actions coded to a DoD acquisition program.

What they sell (PSC)

  1. Support- Professional: Engineering/Technical$1.02B 20%
  2. Miscellaneous Vessels$495M 9.8%
  3. IT and Telecom- Other IT and Telecommunications$266M 5.3%
  4. R&D- Space: Science/Applications (Operational Systems Development)$253M 5.0%
  5. R&D- Space: Other (Applied Research/Exploratory Development)$214M 4.2%
  6. National Defense R&D Services; Atomic Energy Defense Activities; Experimental Development$186M 3.7%
  7. Electron Tubes and Associated Hardware$178M 3.5%
  8. R&D- Defense Other: Other (Applied Research/Exploratory Development)$173M 3.4%
  9. Maint/Repair/Rebuild of Equipment- Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components$153M 3.0%
  10. National Defense R&D Services; Department of Defense - Military; Experimental Development$133M 2.6%
  11. Health R&D Services; Health Care - Other; Applied Research$133M 2.6%
  12. National Defense R&D Services; Atomic Energy Defense Activities; Basic Research$132M 2.6%
  13. Support- Professional: Other$96.6M 1.9%
  14. Miscellaneous Aircraft Accessories and Components$82.5M 1.6%
  15. Guided Missile Systems, Complete$74.8M 1.5%
  16. All other$1.47B 29%

Industry (NAICS)

  1. Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology)$1.47B 29%
  2. Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing$566M 11%
  3. Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)$559M 11%
  4. Ship Building and Repairing$441M 8.7%
  5. Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences$355M 7.0%
  6. Custom Computer Programming Services$276M 5.5%
  7. Engineering Services$231M 4.6%
  8. Other Electronic Component Manufacturing$111M 2.2%
  9. Testing Laboratories and Services$102M 2.0%
  10. Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing$78.5M 1.6%
  11. All other$855M 17%

Where the work is done

  1. Alabama$2.90B 57%
  2. California$1.27B 25%
  3. Massachusetts$194M 3.8%
  4. New Hampshire$168M 3.3%
  5. Oregon$141M 2.8%
  6. Oklahoma$138M 2.7%
  7. Maryland$47.0M 0.9%
  8. Tennessee$28.1M 0.6%
  9. District of Columbia$27.9M 0.6%
  10. Ohio$27.8M 0.5%
  11. Mississippi$18.7M 0.4%
  12. Florida$15.9M 0.3%
  13. North Carolina$15.4M 0.3%
  14. Texas$9.8M 0.2%
  15. Virginia$6.6M 0.1%
  16. All other$46.2M 0.9%

Contract pricing

  1. Firm Fixed Price$1.88B 37%
  2. Cost Plus Fixed Fee$1.59B 32%
  3. Cost Plus Award Fee$884M 17%
  4. Time and Materials$356M 7.0%
  5. Cost Plus Incentive Fee$267M 5.3%
  6. Cost No Fee$28.1M 0.6%
  7. Fixed Price Incentive$25.1M 0.5%
  8. Labor Hours$13.3M 0.3%
  9. All other$11.8M 0.2%

Competition

  1. Full and Open Competition$3.25B 64%
  2. Not Competed$1.48B 29%
  3. Not Competed Under SAP$122M 2.4%
  4. Competed Under SAP$74.4M 1.5%
  5. Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources$67.3M 1.3%
  6. Not Available for Competition$60.1M 1.2%
  7. Competitive Delivery Order$634K 0.0%
  8. Non-Competitive Delivery Order$279K 0.0%
  9. All other$5K 0.0%

Largest awards10

  • IGF::CT::IGF Mission Operations and Integration (Mo&i) Contract. This Contract Involves Operations Support for All Phases of Flight Including Mission Preparation, Crew and Flight Controller Training, and Real-time Operations Requirements for Spaceflight Operations Support. the Core Services Portion of the Contract Establishes Requirements for Payload Operations in Support of the International Space Station (Iss) Program, While Task Orders Issued Under the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Component Will Provide the Capability to Add Operations Support for Other Program or Project Requirements.NASA · USAspending ↗
    $372MFeb 6, 2013
  • Marshall Operations Systems, Services, and Integration II (Mossi II)NASA · USAspending ↗
    $276MSep 9, 2022
  • Production of FMS Boats U1, U2, and U3U.S. Navy · USAspending ↗
    $256MSep 27, 2019
  • Systems Development&operations Support A Primary Mission of the Marshall Space Flight Center (Msfc) Is to Support Nasa's Human Exploration and Development of Space (Heds) Enterprise and the Office of Biological and Physical Research (Obpr) Enterprise Who Are Working Together to Facilitate Long-term Exploration of Space. Msfc Serves As Nasa's Lead Center for the Materials Science and Biotechnology Disciplines and Serves Other Customers and Sponsors Within the Agency. the Purposes of This Contract Are to Further the Science Goals of the Agency by 1) Developing, Operating and Maintaining Facilities and Payloads on the International Space Station (Iss) and Other Vehicles and Carriers, 2) Providing Science, Technical and Engineering Support to Investigators, and 3) Providing Management and Administrative Support to Msad. the Contractor Shall Provide the Necessary Management, Personnel, and Equipment/supplies (Not Otherwise Provided by the Government) Required to Perform the Engineering, Science and Technical Tasks Broadly Defined in This Statement of Work (Sow) and More Specifically Described in the Task/delivery Order (Order) and Technical Directives Issued by the Government. the Contractor Shall Provide the Planning, Coordination, Technical Direction, and Surveillance of the Activities Necessary to Assure Disciplined Performance of Work and Timely Application of Resources for the Accomplishment of All Orders Issued Under the Contract Approved by Msad. the Contractor Shall Establish, Implement, and Maintain A Financial Reporting System in Accordance with the NASA Far Supplement (Nfs) 1852.242-73 and NASA Procedures and Guidelines (Npg) 9501.2D. the Contractor Shall Provide the Overall Management Effort Required to Integrate Technical and Programmatic Functions Necessary for Achievement of the Objectives of the Contract. the Contractor Shall Develop, Submit, and Maintain Detailed Master Schedules Based on A Logic Driven Network That Supports Applicable Msad Project and Iss Program Managed Milestones. the Contractor Shall Be Responsible for Procurement Functions: the Contractor Shall Create, Maintain and Submit in the Format Specified by Msad, Miscellaneous Graphics, Presentations and Reports Supporting the Payloads and the Research Program, and the Major Msad Program Activities and Milestones. the Contractor Shall Define, Design, Develop, Fabricate, Assemble, Test, Deliver, Integrate and Operate Microgravity Science Payloads and Facilities. the Contractor Shall Define the Resources, Structure, Approach, and Processes Required to Complete the Final Design, Development, Fabrication, Assembly, Test, Integration, Operation, Maintenance, Support, and Retirement of the Required Hardware, Software, and Associated Infrastructure. the Contractor Shall Support or Conduct Technical Reviews Appropriate for Individual Payload Development and to Meet the Requirements of the Order.NASA · USAspending ↗
    $216MOct 30, 2007
  • IGF::OT::IGF Launch Vehicle/stages AdapterNASA · USAspending ↗
    $209MJan 31, 2014
  • Tactical Range Air Derense Missile (Tacram) IIU.S. Army · USAspending ↗
    $106MJun 14, 2024
  • IGF::OT::IGF the Contractor Shall Develop A Single Inclusive, Modular Scalable, Reconfigurable, and Composable Osf Framework to Merge System Level M&s. the Osf Framework Shall Be Designed to Be Multiple-instanced with Each Instance Capable of Being Composed and Executed Independently. the Osf Shall Be Designed and Developed to Support Bmds M&s Use Cases Including Ground Test, Performance Assessment, War Games, Exercises and Training Events.Missile Defense Agency · MDA SUPPORT · USAspending ↗
    $99.6MSep 30, 2015
  • SwcsU.S. Special Operations Command · USAspending ↗
    $77.3MJun 30, 2011
  • Seta Support for Targets and Countermeasures (Tc)Missile Defense Agency · MDA SUPPORT · USAspending ↗
    $70.6MSep 24, 2008
  • Osf DevelopmentMissile Defense Agency · MDA SUPPORT · USAspending ↗
    $70.0MAug 30, 2011

Signed obligations on federal prime contracts (award types A–D) from USAspending, FY2008 through Oct 9, 2026. Obligations are money the government committed, not company revenue, and include de-obligations. Subcontracts and grants are excluded. Matching is by registered UEI. “Including subsidiaries” adds our listed subsidiaries (from their acquisition date, where known) and actions whose reported parent is this company.

View all 7,559 awards →

Sources1

  1. 1
    Regulatory filingTeledyne Technologies Incorporated Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025

    Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (SEC EDGAR) · Feb 20, 2026 · Supports Organization · description, Organization · hq city, Organization · ownership, Organization · ticker, Organization · website

    “Our businesses are aligned in four segments: Digital Imaging, Instrumentation, Aerospace and Defense Electronics, and Engineered Systems.”

Government identifiers1

UEI
SQ2DSCE69F15
confirmed · Checked Oct 10, 2026
Source ↗

Identifiers are matched to this legal entity; related companies may hold different registrations.

Each fact on this page is attached to the sources that support it. Archived copies are linked when we keep one.